Featured

Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation and Multiculturalism

‘Idolatry of King Solomon’ -Frans Francken II

It is clear from many factors that the story of Scripture is about one single race and its struggles against both moral and racial corruption at the hands of evil. Here I will not discuss the origination of this struggle at any length as I have undertaken that endeavour elsewhere.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Serpent Seed’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-origins-of-the-serpent-seed/

My purpose here will be to point out and explain some of the instances in Scripture where we recieve instruction and information regarding our obligation to our Father to remain separate from the other races so that we may remain in his image.

It is obvious from many passages of Scripture that the ideal is to marry someone of one’s own race and ethnic kindred. This is exemplified by the fathers as seen in Genesis 24 where we read that Abraham desires for Isaac to marry a woman of his own tribe.

“1And Abraam was old, advanced in days, and the Lord blessed Abraam in all things. 2And Abraam said to his servant the elder of his house, who had rule over all his possessions, Put thy hand under my thigh, 3and I will adjure thee by the Lord the God of heaven, and the God of the earth, that thou take not a wife for my son Isaac from the daughters of the Chananites, with whom I dwell, in the midst of them. 4But thou shalt go instead to my country, where I was born, and to my tribe, and thou shalt take from thence a wife for my son Isaac.”
-Genesis 24

Isaac’s son Esau would not follow in his father’s footsteps but rather would forsake his heritage and take wives of the mongrelized Canaanite tribes.

“34And Esau was forty years old; and he took to wife Judith the daughter of Beoch the Chettite, and Basemath, daughter of Helon the Chettite. 35And they were provoking to Isaac and Rebecca.”
-Genesis 26

Rebecca was so saddened at Esau’s fornication that she saw no worth in living if Jacob too would marry racial aliens like Esau did.

“46And Rebecca said to Isaac, I am weary of my life, because of the daughters of the sons of Chet; if Jacob shall take a wife of the daughters of this land, wherefore should I live?”
-Genesis 27

At Isaac’s behest Jacob went to his uncle Laban (meaning “White”) in Mesopotamia to find his kindred wife Rachel who would bear children of the promise.

“1And Isaac having called for Jacob, blessed him, and charged him, saying, Thou shalt not take a wife of the daughters of the Chananites. 2Rise and depart quickly into Mesopotamia, to the house of Bathuel the father of thy mother, and take to thyself thence a wife of the daughters of Laban thy mother’s brother. 3And may my God bless thee, and increase thee, and multiply thee, and thou shalt become gatherings of nations.”
-Genesis 28

The example of Jacob’s imperative to marry a woman of his mother’s tribe refutes the common argument that miscegenation was only forbidden on religious grounds. The truth is that Laban’s family was pagan (Genesis 31.19-35). If Jacob’s parents were only concerned about their son’s religious integrity they would not have sent him to take a pagan wife. If race was of no concern he may as well have married a Canaanite like his brother. It is thus evident that their concern was for their racial posterity.

Jacob’s son Judah was a fornicator and he erred by taking a Canaanite wife. Two of his halfbreed children were stricken down by God but one of his bastard offspring named Shelah lived. Despite Shelah being Judah’s first born living son he was not considered a valid heir. Rather Pharez was firstborn preceding his twin Zarah from the womb. Shelah was not even a potential heir for he was born of fornication while Pharez and Zarah were born of Tamar, a pedigreed Semite.

The Levitical priesthood was held to a very high standard concerning ethnic homogeneity. While other Israelites were permitted on occasion to marry between Israelite tribes and even sometimes to take wives of Adamic nations apart from Israel, the Levites were commanded to marry Levite women.

“13He shall take for a wife a virgin of his own tribe. 14But a widow, or one that is put away, or profaned, or a harlot, these he shall not take; but he shall take for a wife a virgin of his own people. 15And he shall not profane his seed among his people: I am the Lord that sanctifies him.”
-Leviticus 21

The ideal of homogeneity is also encoded in other Levitical laws concerning the day to day lives of the Israelites. These serve as reminders of Israel’s duty to remain pure and set apart from the other nations.

“19 Keep ye my laws. Thou shalt not make thy cattle to gender with beasts of any other kind. Thou shalt not sow thy field with different seeds. Thou shalt not wear a garment that is woven of two sorts.”
-Leviticus 19

The following passage from the deuterocanonical book the Wisdom of Sirach sheds light on a deeper meaning of this Levitical law regarding the sowing of seed. It is not just a rule for agricultural practice.

“19 My son, keep the flower of thine age sound; and give not thy strength to strangers. 20 When thou hast gotten a fruitful possession through all the field, sow it with thine own seed, trusting in the goodness of thy stock. 21 So thy race which thou leavest shall be magnified, having the confidence of their good descent.”
-Sirach 26

The importance of racial purity is emphasized in other deuterocanonical or apocryphal sources. While these sources are not canonical Scriptures they surely do indicate to us that ancient Judaeans and early Christians understood the importance of racial purity and separatism. 

In the apocryphal book of 4 Maccabees the ideal wife is exemplified as a virgin Israelite untainted by miscegenation who cares for her Adamic posterity. 

“7 And the righteous mother of the seven children spake also as follows to her offspring: I was a pure virgin, and went not beyond my father’s house; but I took care of the built-up rib [Adam’s rib]. 8 No destroyer of the desert, or ravisher of the plain, injured me; nor did the destructive, deceitful snake, make spoil of my chaste virginity; and I remained with my husband during the period of my prime.”
-4 Maccabees 18

In Tobit chapter 4 Tobit advises his son to marry a wife of his own tribe and to stay away from whores and foreigners. Of course the typical whore in Judaea in their time would be a Canaanite, perhaps a temple prostitute of a pagan god. 

“12 Beware of all whoredom, my son, and chiefly take a wife of the seed of thy fathers, and take not a strange woman to wife, which is not of thy father’s tribe: for we are the children of the prophets, Noe, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob: remember, my son, that our fathers from the beginning, even that they all married wives of their own kindred, and were blessed in their children, and their seed shall inherit the land. 13 Now therefore, my son, love thy brethren, and despise not in thy heart thy brethren, the sons and daughters of thy people, in not taking a wife of them: for in pride is destruction and much trouble, and in lewdness is decay and great want: for lewdness is the mother of famine.”
-Tobit 4

In the Second Temple there was a common Greek Inscription known as the Warning Inscription which condemns racial aliens who trespass in the Temple to death. 

“No stranger (allogene, Strong’s G241 meaning literally “of another race”) is to enter within the balustrade round the temple and enclosure. Whoever is caught will be himself responsible for his ensuing death.” 

At Deuteronomy 23.2 we read that a mamzer (“bastard” in the King James, Strong’s H4464) is excluded from the congregation.

“2 A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the Lord.”
-Deuteronomy 23

Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance defines mamzer thusly:

“bastard
From an unused root meaning to alienate; a mongrel, i.e. Born of a Jewish [sic. Israelite] father and a heathen mother — bastard.”

The first component of mamzer is the root mam meaning “to stain” which according to Gesenius is the root of the noun muwm (H3971) meaning “blemish” or “spot”. While Strong’s does not offer an entry for the root mam Gesenius does on page 445 where he offers the meaning “to stain” or “to disfigure”.

In Gesenius’ Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon at the end of the entry for mamzer we read that some scholars take mamzer from zuwr (H2114) meaning to “turn aside”, “be a stranger”, “go away” or “come from another place” and Strong’s tells us the root of mamzer means “to alienate”. Thus the full literal meaning of mamzer must be “strange/foreign/alien blemish/stain/spot”.

The only other Biblical occurrance of mamzer is at Zechariah 9.6 where we see the prophecy of God’s wrath on various Adamic nations. In the Greek text of Zechariah 9.6 in the Septuagint mamzer is translated allogeneis (G241) which means literally “of another race”. Zechariah of course refers to a mongrel race that would make an end of the Philistines of Ashdod. Quoting from the New American Standard Bible which renders mamzer accurately:

“6 And a mongrel race will dwell in Ashdod, And I will cut off the pride of the Philistines.”
-Zechariah 9

Likewise elsewhere in Scripture we see that entire Adamic nations had been given over to mongrelization in Old Testament times starting with the Hamitic tribes of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia.

“For I am the Lord thy God, the Holy One of Israel, thy Saviour: I gave Egypt for thy ransom, Ethiopia and Seba for thee.”
-Isaiah 43.3

It seems God placed these Hamites between Israel and the non-Adamic Nilotic Congoid tribes who had begun to soil the Adamic blood of Northern Africa, the Horn of Africa and Southern Arabia. Note that Ethiopia and Egypt exist as nations (in the deracinated modern sense), but that God no longer counts them among the nations because they are all demonic hybrids today.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/concerning-the-ancient-aethiops/

God promised He would make a full end of the nations among whom the Israelites were dispersed. Foremost among these were Assyria, Babylon, and Persia which are all home to mongrel races today as are Egypt, Seba, Ethiopia, Ashdod and the whole land of old Philistia.

“28Fear not thou, my servant Jacob, saith the Lord; for I am with thee: she that was without fear and in luxury, has been delivered up: for I will make a full end of every nation among whom I have thrust thee forth; but I will not cause thee to fail: yet will I chastise thee in the way of judgment, and will not hold thee entirely guiltless.”
-Jeremiah 46

Israel was the only nation in the whole Adamic world to whom God had explicitly promised preservation until the last days. Thus we have much in Scripture to teach us the importance of racial posterity. Of course it has been a struggle for us and so we have also recieved many admonitions for fornicating with the mongrelized nations.

Here the prophet Jeremiah speaks of the whoredom of Israel representing the racial nation of Israel as vine. Plant life used to symbolize people, families, nations and races is a very common idiom in Scripture. Notice that the result of their fornication is a stain that cannot be washed away which well describes the darkening inflicted upon mongrel offspring.

“20For of old thou hast broken thy yoke, and plucked asunder thy bands; and thou has said, I will not serve thee, but will go upon every high hill, and under every shady tree, there will I indulge in my fornication.

21Yet I planted thee a fruitful vine, entirely of the right sort: how art thou a strange vine turned to bitterness!

22Though thou shouldest wash thyself with nitre, and multiply to thyself soap, still thou art stained by thine iniquities before me, saith the Lord.”
-Jeremiah 2

We see in the previous passage in Jeremiah that miscegenation is connected with idolatry which was practiced on the high places and in groves. In ancient Canaan the pagan cults to gods such as Astarte and Baal were inextricably linked to fertility rites and temple prostitution. Thus to worship these idols was to be joined to the mongrel Canaanites in fornication.

https://christogenea.org/essays/broken-cisterns

Here in Ezekiel we see the act of idolatry itself described as an act of fornication with strangers. The house of fornication mentioned here is undoubtedly a pagan temple in which sexual rites were performed with racial aliens.

“23And it came to pass after all thy wickedness, saith the Lord, 24that thou didst build thyself a house of fornication, and didst make thyself a public place in every street; 25and on the head of every way thou didst set up thy fornications, and didst defile thy beauty, and didst open thy feet to every passer by, and didst multiply thy fornication.”
-Ezekiel 16

The prophet Isaiah too describes idolatry as an act of adultery with other nations beyond Israel’s borders. Israel is symbolized here as a harlot who makes her bed in the high places of pagan worship.

“3But draw ye near hither, ye lawless children, the seed of adulterers and the harlot.

4Wherein have ye been rioting? and against whom have ye opened your mouth, and against whom have ye loosed your tongue? are ye not children of perdition? a lawless seed?

5who call upon idols under the leafy trees, slaying your children in the valleys among the rocks?

6That is thy portion, this is thy lot: and to them hast thou poured forth drink-offerings, and to these hast thou offered meat-offerings. Shall I not therefore be angry for these things?

7On a lofty and high mountain, there is thy bed, and thither thou carriedst up thy meat-offerings:

8and behind the posts of thy door thou didst place thy memorials. Didst thou think that if thou shouldest depart from me, thou wouldest gain? thou hast loved those that lay with thee;

9and thou hast multiplied thy whoredom with them, and thou hast increased the number of them that are far from thee, and hast sent ambassadors beyond thy borders, and hast been debased even to hell.”
-Isaiah 57

Here in Numbers we see that Israelite men fornicated with the daughters of Moab and were drawn away to worship of their idols.

“1And Israel sojourned in Sattin, and the people profaned itself by going a-whoring after the daughters of Moab. 2And they called them to the sacrifices of their idols; and the people ate of their sacrifices, and worshipped their idols.”
-Numbers 25

One Israelite man even dared to flaunt his fornication before the assembly parading a Moabitess before the faithful of Israel who were greatly distraught at this vulgar display. Phineas was enraged by this and following them to the tent ran his spear through the copulating pair. For this zealous act God’s wrath was quieted and Phineas was blessed with a priesthood.

God knew that the idolatry and fornication of Israel would be a very destructive force and we are plagued by it and the results thereof to this day. Exodus issues this commandment and warning to Israel.

“13Ye shall destroy their altars, and break in pieces their pillars, and ye shall cut down their groves, and the graven images of their gods ye shall burn with fire. 14For ye shall not worship strange gods, for the Lord God, a jealous name, is a jealous God; 15lest at any time thou make a covenant with the dwellers on the land, and they go a whoring after their gods, and sacrifice to their gods, and they call thee, and thou shouldest eat of their feasts, 16and thou shouldest take of their daughters to thy sons, and thou shouldest give of thy daughters to their sons; and thy daughters should go a whoring after their gods, and thy sons should go a whoring after their gods.”
-Exodus 34

Again in Joshua we are warned what will come of mingling with the Canaanite nations who we failed to deal with as commanded.

“10One of you has chased a thousand, for the Lord our God, he fought for you, as he said to us. 11And take ye great heed to love the Lord our God. 12For if ye shall turn aside and attach yourselves to these nations that are left with you, and make marriages with them, and become mingled with them and they with you, 13know that the Lord will no more destroy these nations from before you; and they will be to you snares and stumbling-blocks, and nails in your heels, and darts in your eyes, until ye be destroyed from off this good land, which the Lord your God has given you.”
-Joshua 23

The Canaanites and their hybrid offspring have indeed been snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes leading us ever further into fornication through their multicultural agenda of White genocide.

https://christogenea.org/articles/camp-saints-revisited

There are several instances in Scripture where the act of adultery is associated with idolatry and the related sexual acts. The word adultery in these passages is translated from a group of words deriving from moichos (G3428 through 3432).

Moichos certainly does refer to extramarital sexual relations in many instances but it also often refers figuratively to idolatry and the related sexual acts. This is seen in Isaiah 57.3 (G3432), Jeremiah 5.7 (G3428), 9.2 (G3428), 13.27 (G3430) and 23.14 (G3428) and several other passages.

Lexicon: Anglo-Græco-Latinum Novi Testamenti by Andrew Symson, provides under the entry “adulterer” for the Greek word moichos: “it maketh a confusion in families, through an illegitimate brood.” In Critica Sacra Edward Leigh says of the Greek word moichos: “nam familias confundit illegitima sobole,” which is translated “for it mingles families with an illegal race.”

In the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament the reputable German scholar of Greek Gerhard Kittel offers this definition under the entry for moicheuo: “of the intermingling of animals and men or of different races.” In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe offers for the verb moichaomai the definition “adulterate”.

In Griechisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch Hjalmar Frisk defines the word moichaomai with the German word “verfälschen” which means to adulterate. In A Patristic Greek Lexicon Geoffrey Hugo Lampe defines the adjective moichozeuktikos thusly: “of or relating to an adulterous marriage.” An adulterous marriage you might ask? Is adultery not strictly an extramarital affair? Not according to all archaic uses of the word in English.

In A Greek and English Lexicon to the New Testament by John Parkhurst under the definition for moichalis, the author comments on Matthew 16.4: “Dr. Doddridge interprets [genea moichalis] ‘a spurious race degenerated…'”

In A Comprehensive Lexicon by John Pickering we find the following definition for the noun moichidios: “bastard, spurious.” Lexicon Manuale by Cornelius Schrevel, moichidios is defined in Latin by “adulterinus.” in the Oxford Latin Dictionary adulterinus is defined as “adulterated, impure.” and Lewis and Short add “not full-blooded.”

We can see from the definitions provided that moicheia is not strictly adultery against a spouse (Leviticus 20.10, Matthew 5.32, Mark 10.12 et al.) but also adulteration of racial stock. This of course ties in with the nature of idolatry and its associations with adultery and fornication. 

God’s covenant with Israel is portrayed in Scripture as a marriage covenant (Isaiah 54.1-4, Hosea 2.7, Jeremiah 31.32 et al.) and every instance of idolatry and fornication with the children of other gods is an act of adultery (Jeremiah 13.27, 3.8, Ezekiel 16.30-34 et al.). Thus for the people of God’s covenant to miscegenate is a transgression of the marriage covenant and the commandment; “thou shalt not commit adultery”.

Ezra 9 describes the error of Judah in taking Canaanite wives. We see that this mongrelization is a cause of great distress in Judah.

“1And when these things were finished, the princes drew near to me, saying, The people of Israel, and the priests, and the Levites, have not separated themselves from the people of the lands in their abominations, even the Chananite, the Ethite, the Pherezite, the Jebusite, the Ammonite, the Moabite, and the Moserite and the Amorite. 2For they have taken of their daughters for themselves and their sons; and the holy seed has passed among the nations of the lands, and the hand of the rulers has been first in this transgression.”
-Ezra 9

As we see today the rulers and priesthood were the ones who foremost transgressed in this manner. Today the churches have become cesspools of mongrelization, promoting interracial marriage and embracing non-Adamic races while the ministers eagerly promote this sin. In the following chapter we find the Judahites have a plan to repent and separate from the alien wives and their bastards.

“1So when Esdras had prayed, and when he had confessed, weeping and praying before the house of God, a very great assembly of Israel came together to him, men and women and youths; for the people wept, and wept aloud. 2And Sechenias the son of Jeel, of the sons of Elam, answered and said to Esdras, We have broken covenant with our God, and have taken strange wives of the nations of the land: yet now there is patience of hope to Israel concerning this thing. 3Now then let us make a covenant with our God, to put away all the wives, and their offspring, as thou shalt advise: 4arise, and alarm them with the commands of our God; and let it be done according to the law. Rise up, for the matter is upon thee; and we are with thee: be strong and do. 5Then Esdras arose, and caused the rulers, the priests, and Levites, and all Israel, to swear that they would do according to this word: and they swore. 6And Esdras rose up from before the house of God, and went to the treasury of Joanan the son of Elisub; he even went thither: he ate no bread, and drank no water; for he mourned over the unfaithfulness of them of the captivity. 7And they made proclamation throughout Juda and Jerusalem to all the children of the captivity, that they should assemble at Jerusalem, saying, 8Every one who shall not arrive within three days, as is the counsel of the rulers and the elders, all his substance shall be forfeited, and he shall be separated from the congregation of the captivity. 9So all the men of Juda and Benjamin assembled at Jerusalem within the three days. This was the ninth month: on the twentieth day of the month all the people sat down in the street of the house of the Lord, because of their alarm concerning the word, and because of the storm. 10And Esdras the priest arose, and said to them, Ye have broken covenant, and have taken strange wives, to add to the trespass of Israel. 11Now therefore give praise to the Lord God of our fathers, and do that which is pleasing in his sight: and separate yourselves from the peoples of the land, and from the strange wives. 12Then all the congregation answered and said, This thy word is powerful upon us to do it. 13But the people is numerous, and the season is stormy, and there is no power to stand without, and the work is more than enough for one day or for two; for we have greatly sinned in this matter. 14Let now our rulers stand, and for all those in our cities who have taken strange wives, let them come at appointed times, and with them elders from every several city, and judges, to turn away the fierce wrath of our God from us concerning this matter. 15Only Jonathan the son of Asael, and Jazias the son of Thecoe were with me concerning this; and Mesollam, and Sabbathai the Levite helped them. 16And the children of the captivity did thus: and Esdras the priest, and heads of families according to their house were separated, and all by their names, for they returned in the first day of the tenth month to search out the matter. 17And they made an end with all the men who had taken strange wives by the first day of the first month.”
-Ezra 10

In Nehemiah we find a witness to a similar circumstance where we see Judah repent from its idolatry and fornication and segregate itself from all aliens. Clearly these Judahites understood the importance of racial separation according to the law.

“1Now on the twenty-fourth day of this month the children of Israel assembled with fasting, and in sackcloths, and with ashes on their head. 2And the children of Israel separated themselves from every stranger, and stood and confessed their sins, and the iniquities of their fathers. 3And they stood in their place, and read in the book of the law of the Lord their god: and they confessed their sins to the Lord, and worshipped the Lord their God.”
-Nehemiah 9

These passages stand as an example for us as to how one must go about repenting of mixed unions and offspring. We see in chapter 10 of Nehemiah that those of Judah who did not transgress in this way admonished the rest to be separate from the Canaanites. So Christians must do today, excommunicating those who would try to bring a bastard into the congregation of the Lord.

“28And the rest of the people, the priests, the Levites, the porters, the singers, the Nathinim, and every one who drew off from the nations of the land to the law of God, their wives, their sons, their daughters, every one who had knowledge and understanding, 29were urgent with their brethren, and bound them under a curse, and entered into a curse, and into an oath, to walk in the law of God, which was given by the hand of Moses, the servant of God; to keep and to do all the commandments of the Lord, and his judgments, and his ordinances; 30and that we will not, they said, give our daughters to the people of the land, nor will we take their daughters to our sons.”
-Nehemiah 10

It was doubtless difficult for the men of Judah to put away their mongrel wives and offspring as seen in these passages but one must understand the importance of Adamic posterity. Christ said at Luke 14.26 that we must put God before our own kin. Surely if we put bastard offspring before the commandments of God we cannot be his disciples.

Many teachers in the mainstream churches realize to some extent that God commanded racial separation for the children of Israel, however most such teachers believe this is no longer commanded. They claim that since the Gentiles are under the New Covenant that the commandments to be separate can no longer apply. This is absolutely false, for we Gentiles under the New Covenant are none other than the dispersed Israelites scattered abroad and we are surely still expected to keep God’s commandments.

‘The New Covenant with Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-new-covenant-with-israel/

‘The Dispersions of Israel: a Company of Nations’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/10/the-dispersions-of-israel-a-company-of-nations/

Throughout the New Testament Gentiles recieve instruction to abstain from fornication. Most are aware that this refers to sexual immorality in general but few accept that fornication means the same thing in the New Testament as in the Old Testament. This of course is foolishness.

The group of words used in the New Testament translated as “fornication”, “fornicate” and “fornicator” are the very same words used in the Old Testament to refer to the acts of miscegenation and idolatry.

Porneia, Strong’s G4202:
“fornication.
From porneuo; harlotry (including adultery and incest); figuratively, idolatry — fornication.”

Thayer:
“1) illicit sexual intercourse
1a) adultery, fornication, homosexuality, lesbianism, intercourse with animals etc. 
1b) sexual intercourse with close relatives; Lev. 18
1c) sexual intercourse with a divorced man or woman; Mk. 10:11,12 2) metaph. the worship of idols 
2a) of the defilement of idolatry, as incurred by eating the sacrifices offered to idols”

Porneuo, Strong’s G4203:
“commit fornication.
From porne; to act the harlot, i.e. (literally) indulge unlawful lust (of either sex), or (figuratively) practise idolatry — commit (fornication).”

Thayer:
“1) to prostitute one’s body to the lust of another
2) to give one’s self to unlawful sexual intercourse 
2a) to commit fornication 
3) metaph. to be given to idolatry, to worship idols 
3a) to permit one’s self to be drawn away by another into idolatry”

Porne, Strong’s G4204:
“prostitute, harlot
Feminine of pornos; a strumpet; figuratively, an idolater — harlot, whore.”

Thayer:
“1) a woman who sells her body for sexual uses
1a) a prostitute, a harlot, one who yields herself to defilement for the sake of gain 
1b) any woman indulging in unlawful sexual intercourse, whether for gain or for lust 
2) metaph. an idolatress 
2a) of “Babylon” i.e. Rome, the chief seat of idolatry”

Pornos, Strong’s G4205:
“fornicator, whoremonger.
From pernemi (to sell; akin to the base of piprasko); a (male) prostitute (as venal), i.e. (by analogy) a debauchee (libertine) — fornicator, whoremonger.”

Thayer:
“1) a man who prostitutes his body to another’s lust for hire
2) a male prostitute 
3) a man who indulges in unlawful sexual intercourse, a fornicator”

Earlier on in this presentation we looked at Deuteronomy 23.2 and the meaning of the Hebrew word mamzer. In the Septuagint Deuteronomy 23.2 reads “one born of a harlot (G4204)” rather than “a bastard (H4464)”. As we have seen above a porne/harlot is associated with idolatry and fornication and in ancient Canaan a typical prostitute would’ve been a pagan temple prostitute of impure or unknown stock. Thus the Greek text of Deuteronomy 23.2 agrees with the Hebrew in its basic meaning, though it is more specific.

The Latin text of Deuteronomy 23.2 simply transliterates mamzer but offers the note “hoc est de scorto natus” meaning “that is to say, one born of whoredom”. This translation agrees with the Greek while retaining the original Hebrew word for a mongrel.

Adultery, harlotry and miscegenation are all inextricably linked in Scripture. It is also evident in the law that miscegenation is forbidden and thus fits the definitions of illicit or unlawful.

Jesus tells us not one jot or tittle of the law shall pass until heaven and earth pass (Matthew 5.18). St. Paul says that the law is not nullified and that we as Christians ought to establish the law (Romans 3.31). The law of God is the unchanging standard by which sin is defined and in reading the law we find the commandment to be pure and separate, abstaining from fornication. There is no other standard to define the sin of fornication if not the law of God.

There are several witnesses in the New Testament which refute the notion that the Scriptural definition of fornication was changed at the establishment of the New Covenant. Here St. Paul writes to the Dorian Greeks of Corinth. These Corinthians were descendants of the ancient dispersion of Israel among the Grecians.

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

Here St. Paul refers to Numbers 25 where God destroyed a portion of Israel for fornicating with with the Moabites as did some of the Israelites among the forebears of both St. Paul and the Corinthians.

“1 Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea;

2 And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;

3 And did all eat the same spiritual meat;

4 And did all drink the same spiritual drink: for they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them: and that Rock was Christ.

5 But with many of them God was not well pleased: for they were overthrown in the wilderness.

6 Now these things were our examples, to the intent we should not lust after evil things, as they also lusted.

7 Neither be ye idolaters, as were some of them; as it is written, The people sat down to eat and drink, and rose up to play.

8 Neither let us commit fornication, as some of them committed, and fell in one day three and twenty thousand.”
-Corinthians 10

Clearly St. Paul is instructing his readers to abstain from the sin committed by their ancient Israelite forebears which was miscegenation. The one who led Israel to fornication with Moab was Balaam and for this he is condemned throughout Scripture.

In the epistle of St. Jude “the error of Balaam” is mentioned in relation to the sin of the fallen Angels bound in “chains of darkness” who mongrelized creation.

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/divers-seed-defiles-families-or-how-angels-become-chained-darkness

The error of Balaam is also mentioned alongside the sin of Sodom and Gomorrha in “going after strange flesh”. Some claim this verse refers to homophilia, but this interpretation is the opposite of the meaning of the Greek text which uses sarkos (Strong’s G4561 meaning “flesh”) heteras (G2087 meaning “different”, “altered” or “strange”). Heteras is an antonym of homou (G3674) which gives us the prefix homo.

“5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

6 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains of darkness unto the judgment of the great day.

7 Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

8 Likewise also these filthy dreamers defile the flesh, despise dominion, and speak evil of dignities.

9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee.

10 But these speak evil of those things which they know not: but what they know naturally, as brute beasts, in those things they corrupt themselves.

11 Woe unto them! for they have gone in the way of Cain, and ran greedily after the error of Balaam for reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Core.

12 These are spots in your feasts of charity, when they feast with you, feeding themselves without fear: clouds they are without water, carried about of winds; trees whose fruit withereth, without fruit, twice dead, plucked up by the roots;

13 Raging waves of the sea, foaming out their own shame; wandering stars, to whom is reserved the blackness of darkness for ever.”
-Jude 1

Later in this chapter Jude quotes Enoch concerning the judgement of these idolaters, fornicators and mongrels. In all the extant Enoch literature we find the consistent theme of mongrelization as as a grevious sin and the mongrels as worthy of destruction.

“9 And to Gabriel said the Lord: ‘Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy [the children of fornication and] the children of the Watchers from amongst men [and cause them to go forth]: send them one against the other that they may destroy each other in battle: for length of days shall they not have.”
-Enoch 10

St. Jude’s words remind us also of the words of St. Peter in chapter 2 of his second epistle. Here we again see the condemnation of the forces and acts of miscegenation in the Old Testament and fittingly these sins are associated with those who would seek to deceive and undermine Christendom.

“1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of.

3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.

4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment;

5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;

6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those that after should live ungodly;

7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked:

8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;)

9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations, and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:

10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they, selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.

11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring not railing accusation against them before the Lord.

12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and shall utterly perish in their own corruption;

13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they feast with you;

14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with covetous practices; cursed children:

15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray, following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of unrighteousness;

16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.

17 These are wells without water, clouds that are carried with a tempest; to whom the mist of darkness is reserved for ever.”
-2 Peter 2

So we see from the epistles of St. Jude and St. Peter the condemnation of miscegenation as an act of fornication and the reminder that the results of that sin plague us to this day. They remain among us as blemishes, spots in our feasts of charity (recall the definition of mamzer), snares, stumbling-blocks, nails in our heels, and darts in our eyes as prophecied (Joshua 23.13).

St. Peter also mentions Noah’s preservation from the flood when God destroyed the Adamites and their bastard offspring from the land. Noah was chosen to preserve the Adamic race because he was “perfect in his race”. (Genesis 6.9, genea, Strong’s G1074 meaning “race”or “family”).

The error of Balaam is mentioned yet again in Revelation chapter 2 where we again see Israel mingling with Moab defined as an act of fornication.

“12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges;

13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.

14 But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

15 So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitanes, which thing I hate.

16 Repent; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the sword of my mouth.”
-Revelation 2

In his epistle to the Hebrews St. Paul describes Esau as a fornicator and profane person. As we have seen earlier in this presentation Esau was indeed a fornicator. His act of fornication was miscegenation and he is never recorded as having had extramarital or incestuous sexual relations. Rather as we saw earlier in this article his marriages themselves were condemned because his wives were taken of the mongrel Canaanites.

“14 Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord:

15 Looking diligently lest any man fail of the grace of God; lest any root of bitterness springing up trouble you, and thereby many be defiled;

16 Lest there be any fornicator, or profane person, as Esau, who for one morsel of meat sold his birthright.”
-Hebrews 12

In John chapter 8 Jesus is adressing his Judaean detractors. As history and Scripture attest these Judaeans were descended from bastardized seed of Abraham through the fornication of Esau and Judah.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Edomite Jews’ https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

These Judaeans tried to justify themselves by stating their descent from Abraham and denying being born of fornication. Christ affirms that they are indeed spurious where in verses 42-44 he calls them sons of the devil.

“37 I know that ye are Abraham’s seed; but ye seek to kill me, because my word hath no place in you.

38 I speak that which I have seen with my Father: and ye do that which ye have seen with your father.

39 They answered and said unto him, Abraham is our father. Jesus saith unto them, If ye were Abraham’s children, ye would do the works of Abraham.

40 But now ye seek to kill me, a man that hath told you the truth, which I have heard of God: this did not Abraham.

41 Ye do the deeds of your father. Then said they to him, We be not born of fornication; we have one Father, even God.

42 Jesus said unto them, If God were your Father, ye would love me: for I proceeded forth and came from God; neither came I of myself, but he sent me.

43 Why do ye not understand my speech? even because ye cannot hear my word.

44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.”
-John 8

These Judaean’s denial of their bastardized heritage in verse 41 is a reference to Malachi 2 where we find that Judah has married the daughter of a strange God. This of course refers to the mingling of the sons of Judah with the daughters of Canaan who indeed descended in part from the devil’s brood. Thus Jesus rightly tells them they do the deeds of their father the devil. One may descend paternally from the patriarchs but if one is born of fornication they are cut off and belong to the devil.

“10Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why then doth every one of us despise his brother, violating the covenant of our fathers?

11Juda hath transgressed, and abomination hath been committed in Israel, and in Jerusalem: for Juda hath profaned the holiness of the Lord, which he loved, and hath married the daughter of a strange god.

12The Lord will cut off the man that hath done this, both the master, and the scholar, out of the tabernacles of Jacob, and him that offereth an offering to the Lord of hosts.”
-Malachi 2

Some will point to the law of the proselyte in the Old Testament as evidence that the Israelite ethno-religion was racially compromising, however Scripture disproves this. Under the Old Covenant only non-Israelites of Adamic stock were permitted to live among Israel and were expected to keep the laws given to Israel. Racial aliens are specifically excluded.

“43And the Lord said to Moses and Aaron, This is the law of the passover: no stranger (allogenes, G241 meaning literally “of another race” i.e. a non-Adamite) shall eat of it. 44And every slave or servant bought with money—him thou shalt circumcise, and then shall he eat of it. 45A sojourner or hireling shall not eat of it. 46In one house shall it be eaten, and ye shall not carry of the flesh out from the house; and a bone of it ye shall not break. 47All the congregation of the children of Israel shall keep it. 48And if any proselyte shall come to you to keep the passover to the Lord, thou shalt circumcise every male of him, and then shall he approach to sacrifice it, and he shall be even as the original inhabitant of the land; no uncircumcised person shall eat of it. 49There shall be one law to the native, and to the proselyte coming among you.”
-Exodus 12

We also find other Scriptures which remind us of the proselyte’s obligation to the law (Leviticus 24.22, Numbers 9.14, 15.15-16). These ordinances set the precedent for later Christian assemblies. The Israelite nations with whom the New Covenant was made co-existed with the remnants of the various Adamic nations who had preceded them into Europe, the Mediterranean Basin and Asia Minor. Under this provision of the law these other Adamites dwell among us as Christians keeping the statutes of Israel and sharing in the passover.

‘The Tree of Life: Redemption of the Adamic Race’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/the-tree-of-life-redemption-of-the-adamic-race/

In attempting to defend miscegenation many have claimed that certain women who married Israelites were of alien racial stock. Of course even if they were not in error in claiming these women were racial aliens, such alleged exceptions could never negate the rules laid out in Scripture which condemn miscegenation. Here I will not discuss these errors at any great length as better scholars have already undertaken that work.

https://comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/whom-did-moses-marry

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/ruth-was-israelite-ruth-was-not-moabite-race

https://christogenea.org/podcasts/women-genealogy-christ-06-21-09

It is often claimed that Zipporah was a negress like certain modern inhabitants of Ethiopia but it is clear that Zipporah was a Midianite from the Cush/Ethiopia of Asia (Herodotus, Histories 3.94, 7.70, Josephus Antiquities 1.6.2). This is apparent from the fact that Moses met her in Midian (Exodus 2.15), of which her father was high priest (2.16) and that her father Jethro is elsewhere called a Midianite (Numbers 10.29).

Even so, it can be demonstrated that the Ethiopians of the Horn of Africa were originally a goodly Adamic race and not the mongrelized Caucasoid-Congoid hybrids who dwell there today. Thus even on the basis of the errant assumption that Zipporah was from the Southern Ethiopia one could not rightly accuse Moses of fornication.

‘Concerning the Ancient Aethiops’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/28/concerning-the-ancient-aethiops/

Some claim that Ruth was a racial Moabitess as she is called a Moabitess in the book of Ruth, however it can be established that she was an Israelite by race and only a Moabitess by geography. Such references to Israelites as inhabitants of regions in Canaan are elsewhere found in our Old Testament at 2 Samuel 23. There we see Israelite warriors are named as Beerothite, Pirathonite, Shaalbonite and Ammonite etc. according to their habitation and not their race.

It is certain that in the time of Ruth Moab belonged to the Israelites as Scripture clearly informs us (Numbers 21.25-29, Deuteronomy 3.12-16, Judges 11.12-26, Zephaniah 2.9, Isaiah 25.10). Only a small portion of the territory of Moab was retained by the Moabites South of the river Arnon, bordered by the land given to the tribe of Reuben in the North, and by Edom in the South.

In Deuteronomy 23.3 we are told that a Moabite is excluded from the congregation of Israel even to the tenth generation. Ruth’s descendant David only a few generations later was certainly a part of the congregation (Psalm 40.9) and was a man treasured by God. Certainly his ancestor Ruth could not have been a Moabite and to claim otherwise is an insult to God and his law.

It is further proven that Ruth was an Israelite in Ruth 4 where we find she is redeemed by Boaz, an Israelite. Another Israelite man was first in line to redeem her (thus even closer kin) yet could not due to his personal circumstances. According to the law the role of a redeemer could only be fulfilled by a kinsmen (Deuteronomy 25.5-10) and so her redeemer had to have been kindred. Obviously her kindred were Israelites.

Some point to Ruth 1.16 where Ruth’s words are commonly translated “your people shall be my people and your God shall be my God” yet the words “shall be” are not to be found in the Greek, Hebrew or Latin text but are merely inserted by later translators acting upon their errant interpretations. Better translations are provided by the Wycliffe Bible and Young’s Literal translation which read “thi puple is my puple, and thi God is my God” and “thy people is my people, and thy God my God.”.

Some claim that Rahab was a Canaanite but there is no Scripture whatsoever to support this. It is simply errantly assumed that she was a Canaanite because she inhabited a city of Canaan, yet so did many Hebrews such as Abraham himself as well as the Adamic Philistines and so we cannot simply assume that any inhabitant of Canaan was a racial Canaanite. Such an assumption is certainly errant, especially when it implies illicit ancestry in the genealogy of our Lord Jesus Christ.

It is amply clear throughout the law, the prophets, and the writings of the apostles that the definition of fornication includes miscegenation and remains the same as when God established it. It refers to sexual deviancy in all its forms, and that clearly still includes miscegenation. To deny this is to deny much of the essential fabric of Scripture. This is an expansive topic which ties in to every facet of Scripture in some way, but I hope that here I have made a compelling case for the importance of racial separatism for the children of God.

“12The heaven is amazed at this, and is very exceedingly horror-struck, saith the Lord. 13For my people has committed two faults, and evil ones: they have forsaken me, the fountain of water of life, and hewn out for themselves broken cisterns, which will not be able to hold water.”
-Jeremiah 2

“15Drink waters out of thine own vessels, and out of thine own springing wells 16Let not waters out of thy fountain be spilt by thee, but let thy waters go into thy streets. 17Let them be only thine own, and let no stranger partake with thee. 18Let thy fountain of water be truly thine own; and rejoice with the wife of thy youth. 19Let thy loving hart and thy graceful colt company with thee, and let her be considered thine own, and be with thee at all times; for ravished with her love thou shalt be greatly increased. 20Be not intimate with a strange woman, neither fold thyself in the arms of a woman not thine own.”
-Proverbs 5



Advertisements