Physical Descriptions of the Adamites, Shemites, Hebrews, Israelites and Judahites

In recent times it has become popular to claim that the ancient Israelites were racially alien to modern Europeans. This idea stems from the recent anti-White and anti-Christian cultural movements which find it beneficial to convince Whites that Christianity is alien to the Europoid race. Even White nationalists have taken up this narrative to support their disdain for Christianity learned from the Edomite Jewish mainstream media which seeks to indoctrinate us from cradle to grave. 

https://christogenea.org/articles/white-nationalist-cognitive-dissonance

While this notion has gained traction in recent years, centuries of European Christian art have painted a very different picture. While anti-Whites continue to scoff at these traditional Christian depictions, recent discoveries in the fields of archaeology and archaeogenetics have vindicated the traditional Christian view of the racial traits of the ancient Israelites.

‘The Mona Lisa of Sepphoris’, Sepphoris, Galilee.

Ancient Judaean mosaics have been unearthed in Palestine, particularly in the region of Galilee, the land of the nativity of our Lord Jesus Christ. The defining features of the races of the modern Middle-East like Armenoids and Arabids are absent in these depictions. Features such as the “permanent smile” and drooping hooked noses are not to be seen. 

While Judaea had suffered racial infiltration by the Edomites beginning in the late 2nd century BC bringing the ancestors of modern Jewry to ancient Judaea, it seems that Galilee was not affected noticeably by this intrusion even up until the 5th century AD.

‘The Satanic Origins of the Edomite Jews’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/the-satanic-origins-of-the-edomite-jews/

These mosaics consistently display the Europoid features of the Judaeans who display hyperdepigmentation and straight, upright noses as well as modest lips. Some scoffers claim these mosaics are Greek rather than Judaean, but the Syriac text which accompanies many of these depictions and their location in synagogues disprove that claim as does the fact that early Byzantine Galilee maintained a Judaean majority well into the era in question.

Sepphoris, Galilee.

The Judaeans are even depicted alongside ancient Greeks and there is no apparent dissimilarity between the two groups. This lends credence to the testimony of Flavius Josephus who indicates to us that the ancient Judaeans and Greeks were physically indistinguishable but for the circumcision of the Judaeans.

“Wherefore they desired his permission to build them a Gymnasium at Jerusalem. And when he had given them leave, they also hid the circumcision of their genitals, that even when they were naked they might appear to be Greeks.”
-Flavius Josephus, Antiquities, 12.241

Of course the ancient Judaeans were indeed of the same racial stock as the ancient Greeks, and many other proofs of this are to be found in classical history as well as the Christian Scriptures.

‘Dardan, Danaan and Dorian Origins: the Mediterranean Migrations of Ancient Israel’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/dardan-danaan-and-dorian-origins-the-mediterranean-migrations-of-israel-2/

Alexander the Great or Antiochus IV and the Greeks (R) meet the Judean priesthood (L), Huqoq, Galilee.

An archaeogenetic study titled Genome-Wide Diversity in the Levant Reveals Recent Structuring by Culture has proven that the ancient Levantine populations were akin to modern Europeans and not the modern day inhabitants of Middle-Eastern/North-African genetic stock.

“Levant populations today fall into two main groups: one sharing more genetic characteristics with modern-day Europeans and Central Asians, and the other with closer genetic affinities to other Middle Easterners and Africans.”

“We reconstructed the genetic structure of the Levantines and found that a pre-Islamic expansion Levant was more genetically similar to Europeans than to Middle Easterners”

http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pgen.1003316

This information affirms the testimony of the Scriptures which clearly describe the ancient Israelites as Europoid. Here we will examine these Biblical proofs.

“4 Thy neck is as an ivory tower; thine eyes are as pools in Esebon, by the gates of the daughter of many: thy nose is as the tower of Libanus, looking toward Damascus.”
-Song of Solomon 7.4

Huqoq, Galilee.

Here we see the woman described has skin like ivory indicating hyperdepigmentation. Her eyes are described as pools of water such as those of Heshbon. The pools of Heshbon can be seen still today and these are typically green or sometimes blue. The nose of the woman is described as a tower which must describe an upright and narrow nose as seen in the Nordic race.

“10 My kinsman is white (tsach, H6703, leukos, 3022) and ruddy (adom, H122, purrhos, G4450), chosen out from myriads.”
-Song of Solomon 5.10

Strong’s G4450, purros: 
“fiery red
From pur; fire-like, i.e. (specially), flame- colored — red.”

Strong’s H122, adom:
“red, ruddy
From ‘adam; rosy — red, ruddy.”

Strong’s G3022, leukos:
“white.
From luke (“light”); white — white.”

Strong’s H6703, tsach:
“clear, dry, plainly, white
From tsachach; dazzling, i.e. Sunny, bright, (figuratively) evident — clear, dry, plainly, white.”

The descriptors white, red, fire-like, rosy, sunny, bright, clear and white can only describe Europoids. Only a depigmented specimen can exhibit rosiness or ruddiness and only light skin may be rightly described as bright, clear or white.

Sepphoris, Galilee.

“12 And he sent and fetched him: and he was ruddy (admoni, H132, purrazo, G4449), with beauty of eyes, and very goodly to behold. And the Lord said to Samuel, Arise, and anoint David, for he is good.”
-1 Samuel 16.12

These same terms describe David once again in a later passage from the same book.

“42 And Goliath saw David, and despised him; for he was a lad, and ruddy (admoni, H132, purrazo, 4449), with a fair countenance.”
-1 Samuel 17.42

Strong’s H4449, purrazo:
“be red.
From purrhos; to redden (intransitively) — be red.”

Strong’s H132, admoni:
“red, ruddy
Or (fully) admowniy {ad-mo-nee’}; from ‘adam; reddish (of the hair or the complexion) — red, ruddy.”

Again we see an Israelite is described as ruddy however this time it is translated from different but related words. We see here that Strong’s offers the definition “reddish (of the hair or the complexion)” for H132 and either meaning is possible here. I tend to think David was red haired as this is how he is traditionally depicted in Christian art.

Huqoq, Galilee.

“7 Her Nazarites were purer than snow, they were whiter (tsachach, H6705, lampo, G2989) than milk, they were purified as with fire, their polishing was superior to sapphire stone.”
-Lamentations 4.7

Where the Septuagint reads “they were purified as with fire” the King James reads “they were more ruddy (adom, H119) in body than rubies”.

Strong’s G2989, lampos:
“give light, shine.
A primary verb; to beam, i.e. Radiate brilliancy (literally or figuratively) — give light, shine.”

Strong’s H6703, tsachach:
“be whiter
A primitive root; to glare, i.e. Be dazzling white — be whiter.”

Strong’s H119, adom:
“be dyed, made red ruddy
To show blood (in the face), i.e. Flush or turn rosy — be (dyed, made) red (ruddy)”

Here we see Israelites described as white or dazzling to a degree comparable to milk. They are also described as rosy or ruddy. Of course these terms can only describe the contrast of pale skin and the blood flowing through it giving parts of the skin a rosy hue. We see at the end of this verse that their polishing is compared to sapphire stone and this most likely describes the blue veins which can be seen through pale skin.

“22 Therefore thus saith the Lord concerning the house of Jacob, whom he set apart from Abraham, Jacob shall not now be ashamed, neither shall he now wax pale (chavar, H2357).”
-Isaiah 29.22

Strong’s H2357: 
“wax pale
A primitive root; to blanch (as with shame) — wax pale.”

Sepphoris, Galilee.

The Greek text of this verse reads “neither shall he now change countenance” which relays the same message but does not use the expression “wax pale”. Of course to wax pale one must first have clear pale skin which may be rosy with blood. If Jacob was physically unable to wax pale then the words of the prophet would be redundant, which the words of God never are. Of course Jacob, being depigmented, could wax pale.

“7 Thou shalt sprinkle me with hyssop, and I shall be purified: thou shalt wash me, and I shall be made whiter (laban, H3835, leukaino, G3021) than snow.”
-Psalm 51.7

Strong’s G3021, leukainos:
“make white, whiten.
From leukos; to whiten — make white, whiten.”

Strong’s H3835, laban:
“make brick, be made, make whiter
A primitive root; to be (or become) white; also (as denominative from lbenah) to make bricks — make brick, be (made, make) white(-r).”

Notice that the natural state of the speaker when purified and cleansed is white and so this must be how the psalmist perceived himself to naturally appear.

“25And the first came out red (admoni, H132, purrazo, 4449), hairy all over like a skin; and she called his name Esau.”
-Genesis 25.25

While Esau’s offspring were a mongrelized brood, he himself was a pedigreed Hebrew and twin brother of Jacob himself. 

‘Fornication, Adultery and Idolatry: a Biblical Case Against Miscegenation’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/03/06/fornication-adultery-and-idolatry-a-biblical-case-against-miscegenation/

Here we see Esau the Hebrew described with the very same term applied to David in 1 Samuel. It seems that here Esau’s redness must describe the hair in which he was covered. While hairiness may not be a desirable feature it is very prevalent in Northern Europe, and Scandinavia is a contender for the most hirsute region on earth.

Sepphoris, Galilee.

The name Adam itself is derived from Strong’s H119 meaning “to show blood in the face”, “flush or turn rosy” or “be made ruddy”. Many claim Adam derives from adamah (soil), but this defies all convention whereby the smaller component (adam) is the root of the larger derivative (adamah). Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance specifically tells us in the entry for Adam (H120) that it derives from H119.

‘Adam: The Patriarch of One Race’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/adam-the-patriarch-of-one-race/

‘The Origins of the Non-Adamic Races’
https://acompanyofnations.wordpress.com/2019/02/02/the-origins-of-the-non-adamic-races/

Here I will share some apocryphal sources describing various biblical characters. While the authenticity of these texts may be questioned, they surely do indicate to us how the racial traits of the Israelites have been percieved in the past. These accounts are quite clear in their meaning and require no further elaboration from myself.

Huqoq, Galilee.

Description of Abraham’s wife Sarah from the Dead Sea Scrolls Genesis Apocryphon, Column 10:
“How fair are her breasts and how beautiful all her whiteness!”

The Book of Noah 106.2:
“And his body was white as snow and red as the blooming of a rose and the hair of his head and his long locks were white as wool, and his eyes beautiful.”

Description of Jesus Christ from a letter by Lentulus to the Senate:
“A man of stature somewhat tall, and comely, with very reverent countenance, such as the beholders may both love and fear, his hair of (the colour of) the chestnut, full ripe, plain to His ears, whence downwards it is more orient and curling and wavering about His shoulders. In the midst of His head is a seam or partition in His hair, after the manner of the Nazarenes. His forehead plain and very delicate; His face without spot or wrinkle, beautified with a lovely red; His nose and mouth so formed as nothing can be reprehended; His beard thickish, in colour like His hair, not very long, but forked; His look innocent and mature; His eyes grey, clear, and quick- In reproving hypocrisy.”

Sepphoris, Galilee.

Description of Jesus Christ from a letter from Pontius Pilate to Tiberius Caesar:
“His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance.”

Description of Jesus Christ from The Archko Volume:
“He is the picture of his mother, only he has not her smooth, round face. His hair is a little more golden than hers, though it is as much from sunburn as anything else. He is tall, and his shoulders are a little drooped; his visage is thin and of a swarthy complexion, though this is from exposure. His eyes are large and a soft blue, and rather dull and heavy.”

I believe that in light of the provided evidence it is clear that the ancient Israelites were racially Europoid. Despite the best efforts of our adversary to persuade us otherwise, our Christian ancestors surely did not convert to a racially alien faith, nor do we owe our Christian heritage to an alien race.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s